Dallas Jury Awards $73 Million TVM Verdict against Boston Scientific

In the first victory for plaintiffs against Boston Scientific Corp. and their mesh devices, a Dallas, Texas jury found for the plaintiff Martha Salazar and ordered Boston Scientific to pay a staggering $73 million.  Jurors found Boston Scientific to be at fault for the damages that Ms. Salazar suffered as well as a finding of gross negligence, awarding punitive damages to the plaintiff.  The jury awarded approximately $23 million in compensatory damages for her actual and future suffering and $50 million in punitive damages after finding the company was grossly negligent.  (Salazar v. Lopez, District Court for Dallas County, No. DC-12-14349).

Salazar, was implanted with an Obtryx sling on January 17, 2011 by Dr. Jorge Lopez to treat urinary leakage.  As a result of the alleged defective device, Salazar suffered from permanent nerve damage, constant pelvic pain, and had to endure four subsequent surgeries.

Click here to read the full Reuters article: Boston Scientific Ordered to Pay $73 million Over Mesh Device

Boston Scientific plans to appeal the verdict.

The verdict is the third case to go to trial against Boston Scientific over their devices.  The first two, tried in Massachusetts, resulted in verdicts absolving the company of liability.

Vaginal Mesh Trial History

Bard has lost two jury trials, settled a third case after a jury selected, and settled a fourth before trial commenced.  In July 2012, a California jury awarded Christine Scott and her husband $5.5 million after she underwent nine revision surgeries.  Scott sued C.R. Bard in 2009 over its Avaulta Plus mesh product.

In February 2013, Linda Gross won $11.11 million in her lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon brand over its Prolift vaginal mesh product.  Gross had 18 surgeries.  The New Jersey jury found that J&J failed to warn patients and doctors about the risks of its mesh products and made fraudulent misrepresentations.

On August 15, 2013, after about 12 hours of deliberation, the jury found for Donna Cisson in her vaginal mesh trial against manufacturer C.R. Bard Inc, and found damages in the amount of $250,000 and $1.75 million in punitive damages.  The jury found that Bard failed to provide adequate warnings as to the defects in its vaginal mesh product and that the device was defective.  Judge Joseph Goodwin upheld the 2 million verdict in October 2013 as appropriate and that Cisson’s attorneys proved the company’s vaginal mesh was the cause of her injuries.  In Queen vs. Bard, starting trial immediately after Cisson, a settlement was reached after the jury was selected.  Finally, Bard settled Melanie Virgil’s claims that Bard’s Avaulta Plus insert caused urinary problems before trial commenced in New Jersey.

On February 18, 2014, Judge Joseph Goodwin granted Ethicon’s Motion for Directed Verdict at the close of Plaintiff’s case in Lewis vs. Ethicon, Inc. (In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2327, Carolyn Lewis, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., No. 2:12-4301, S.D. W.Va.).

On April 4, 2014, a Dallas jury found for the plaintiff Linda Batiste and ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $1.2 million for its defective design of the Ethicon TVT-O pelvic mesh.

Two Massachusetts juries recently rejected women’s claims that Boston Scientific’s incontinence sling was defective designed and injured women.

On September 5, 2014, a federal jury in West Virginia found for the plaintiff Jo Huskey and ordered Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon to pay $3.27 million.

If you would like more information, check the video below, go to our website, or contact us at 1-800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

Boston Scientific is a registered trademark of Boston Scientific Corp. The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes. Boston Scientific Corp. is not affiliated with this website, and Boston Scientific Corp. has no affiliation with The Brandi Law Firm. Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by Boston Scientific Corp.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

West Virginia Federal Jury Awards $3.27 Million Verdict against Johnson and Johnson’s Ethicon

In another victory for plaintiffs against vaginal-mesh implant manufacturers, a federal jury in West Virginia found for the plaintiff Jo Huskey and ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $3.27 million.  Jurors found that J&J defectively designed the Ethicon TVT-O sling and failed to properly warn doctors and patients the device could erode, subsequently damaging organs and causing pain.  The case was presided over by Judge Joseph Goodwin.  (Huskey v. Ethicon, 12-cv-05201, U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia (Charleston)).

Huskey, a physical therapy assistant from Illinois, was implanted with her Ethicon sling in 2011.  She had surgery to remove the device later that year after suffering pain.

Click here to read the full Bloomberg article: J&J Ordered to Pay $3.27 Million Over Mesh Implant

Ethicon TVT-O

TVT-O (transvaginal tape obturator)

The TVT-O (transvaginal tape obturator) is a polypropylene mesh hammock, sling or tape, designed to support the urethra and correct stress urinary incontinence (SUI).   Like the TVT (transvaginal tape), TVT-O is implanted through the vagina, but unlike the TVT which exits through the lower abdomen, the TVT-O has an exit point through the groin, making mesh injuries and mesh removal potentially harmful and injurious.  Both types of mesh hammocks are still on the market.

Vaginal Mesh Trial History

Bard has lost two jury trials, settled a third case after a jury selected, and settled a fourth before trial commenced.  In July 2012, a California jury awarded Christine Scott and her husband $5.5 million after she underwent nine revision surgeries.  Scott sued C.R. Bard in 2009 over its Avaulta Plus mesh product.

In February 2013, Linda Gross won $11.11 million in her lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon brand over its Prolift vaginal mesh product.  Gross had 18 surgeries.  The New Jersey jury found that J&J failed to warn patients and doctors about the risks of its mesh products and made fraudulent misrepresentations.

On August 15, 2013, after about 12 hours of deliberation, the jury found for Donna Cisson in her vaginal mesh trial against manufacturer C.R. Bard Inc, and found damages in the amount of $250,000 and $1.75 million in punitive damages.  The jury found that Bard failed to provide adequate warnings as to the defects in its vaginal mesh product and that the device was defective.  Judge Joseph Goodwin upheld the 2 million verdict in October 2013 as appropriate and that Cisson’s attorneys proved the company’s vaginal mesh was the cause of her injuries.  In Queen vs. Bard, starting trial immediately after Cisson, a settlement was reached after the jury was selected.  Finally, Bard settled Melanie Virgil’s claims that Bard’s Avaulta Plus insert caused urinary problems before trial commenced in New Jersey.

On February 18, 2014, Judge Joseph Goodwin granted Ethicon’s Motion for Directed Verdict at the close of Plaintiff’s case in Lewis vs. Ethicon, Inc. (In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2327, Carolyn Lewis, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., No. 2:12-4301, S.D. W.Va.).

On April 4, 2014, a Dallas jury found for the plaintiff Linda Batiste and ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $1.2 million for its defective design of the Ethicon TVT-O pelvic mesh.

Two Massachusetts juries recently rejected women’s claims that Boston Scientific’s incontinence sling was defective designed and injured women.

If you would like more information, check the video below, go to our website, or contact us at 1-800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

Johnson & Johnson is a registered trademark of Johnson & Johnson Inc.  The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes.  Johnson & Johnson Inc. is not affiliated with this website, and Johnson & Johnson Inc. has no affiliation with The Brandi Law Firm.  Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by Johnson & Johnson Inc.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Ford Recalls 83,250 2012-2014 Vehicles due to Improper Installation of the Halfshaft

2014 Ford Edge

2014 Ford Edge

Ford announced it would recall 83,250 vehicles involving an installation defect of the halfshaft retention circlip.  During the manufacturing of the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed as designed.  As a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.  Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in ‘Park’, increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Halfshaft

Click here to read the manufacturer notice: Manufacturer Notice – Ford Edge

The following vehicles and model years are affected by this recall:

  • 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013
  • 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013
  • 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013

Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained.  If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge.  The recall began on August 4, 2014.  Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673.  Ford’s number for this recall is 14S10.

Previously in May 2014, Ford recalled 1,176,771 vehicles in two separate actions due to air bag and door defects.

Americans rely on their car manufacturers to provide a safe well-designed vehicle.  Sadly, that is not often the case.  The Auto Defect Attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm has successfully represented many people injured from defective Toyotas, Fords, Chryslers, Hondas, GM products and numerous other manufacturers and suppliers.  Often times, people involved in accidents do not examine the issues of defective vehicle design nor whether the car was truly crashworthy – does it contain the appropriate crash protection.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto crash, our attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm are available to consult with you.  Please contact our office at 800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

Ford is a registered trademark of Ford Motor Company.  The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes.  Ford Motor Company is not affiliated with this website, and Ford Motor Company has no affiliation with the Brandi Law Firm.  Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by Ford Motor Company.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Chrysler Recalls Another 643,618 Vehicles due to Ignition Switch Defect

2006 Jeep Grande Cherokee

2006 Jeep Grande Cherokee

Last week, Chrysler expanded recall 11V-139 to include an additional 525,205 minivans due to an ignition switch defect.  This week, Chrysler has now added another 643,618 Jeeps suffering from the same ignition switch defect.

The issue is once again the ignition switch, which has been the topic of conversation of automobile recalls since GM’s bombshell back in February of this year.  In the affected vehicles, the driver may accidentally hit the ignition key with their knee, unintentionally knocking the key out of the run position, and turning off the engine.  If the key is turned into the off position, the vehicle will lose air bag, power steering and power braking capabilities, which increases the likelihood of a crash.

Chrysler is recalling their Jeep Grand Cherokee and Jeep Commander models. Jeep Grand Cherokees are from the 2005-2007 model line and were manufactured from February 11, 2004, to July 5, 2007.  The Commander models were made from January 31, 2005, to July 5, 2007, and their model years are from 2006 and 2007.

Chrysler has warned all drivers of these vehicles that until this recall is performed, drivers should adjust their seat to allow clearance between the driver’s knee and the ignition key, and remove all items from their key ring, leaving only the vehicle key.

Parts are currently not available and the schedule of repairing the defect is still unknown.  Chrysler will notify owners in September 2014.  The remedy for this recall is still under development. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403.  Chrysler’s number for this recall is P41.

Click here to read the defect notice: Chrysler Ignition Switch Defect

Nearly 40 million vehicles have been recalled in 2014 alone.

Americans rely on their car manufacturers to provide a safe well-designed vehicle.  Sadly, that is not often the case.  The Auto Defect Attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm has successfully represented many people injured from defective Toyotas, Fords, Chryslers, Hondas, GM products and numerous other manufacturers and suppliers.  Often times, people involved in accidents do not examine the issues of defective vehicle design nor whether the car was truly crashworthy – does it contain the appropriate crash protection.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto crash, our attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm are available to consult with you.  Please contact our office at 800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

Chrysler is a registered trademark of Chrysler Group LLC. The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes. Chrysler Group LLC is not affiliated with this website, and Chrysler Group LLC has no affiliation with The Brandi Law Firm. Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by Chrysler Group LLC.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

BMW Recalls 573,935 Vehicles Due to a Passenger Side Air Bag Defect

2005 BMW M3

2005 BMW M3

BMW will recall 573,935 sedans, coupes, convertibles and Sports Wagons due to a defect in the passenger side air bag.  This is an expansion of BMW’s earlier recall back in April 2013.  The problem is to address a safety defect in the passenger side frontal air bag inflator.  The issue is the inflator may release excessive internal pressure that could cause the air bag inflator to rupture upon deployment of the air bag. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger’s frontal air bag, excessive internal pressure could cause rupturing of the inflator resulting in metal fragments striking and potentially seriously injuring the passenger seat occupant or other occupants.

Click here to read the defect notice: BMW Passenger Air Bag Defect

The vehicles involves in this recall include:

Model Year/Model                                                 Inclusive Dates of Manufacture

2000 – 2005 / 3 Series Sedan                                      Jun 1999 – Aug 2005

2000 – 2006 / 3 Series Coupe                                     Jun 1999 – Aug 2006

2000 – 2005 / 3 Series Sports Wagon                       Jan 2000 – Aug 2005

2000 – 2006 / 3 Series Convertible                           Dec 1999 – Aug 2006

2001 – 2006 / M3 Coupe                                              Feb 2001 – May 2006

2001 – 2006 / M3 Convertible                                    Mar 2001 – Aug 2006

Parts are currently not available to fix the defect.  BMW will notify owners, and dealers will replace the passenger side frontal air bag, free of charge. An interim notice will be mailed to owners in August 2014.  A second notice will be mailed when an adequate supply of parts is available, currently anticipated to be in October 2014.  Owners may contact BMW customer service at 1-800-525-7417 or email BMW at CustomerRelations@bmwusa.com.

Americans rely on their car manufacturers to provide a safe well-designed vehicle.  Sadly, that is not often the case.  The Auto Defect Attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm has successfully represented many people injured from defective Toyotas, Fords, Chryslers, Hondas, GM products and numerous other manufacturers and suppliers.  Often times, people involved in accidents do not examine the issues of defective vehicle design nor whether the car was truly crashworthy – does it contain the appropriate crash protection.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto crash, our attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm are available to consult with you.  Please contact our office at 800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

BMW is a registered trademark of Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.  The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes.  Bayerische Motoren Werke AG is not affiliated with this website, and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG has no affiliation with the Brandi Law Firm.  Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.

, , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Tom Brandi Again Named to 2014 Northern California Super Lawyers Top Ten

 

Tom Brandi was named to the 2014 Top Ten Lawyers for Northern California for the second consecutive year.  Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.  According to Super Lawyers, “The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.”  Tom Brandi has been in the Top 100 every year since the inception of Super Lawyers and this is his third appearance in the Top Ten.

 

The complete list of Top Ten Lawyers for Northern California were:

Brandi, Thomas J.

Cabraser, Elizabeth J. (Ranked Number 3)

Cotchett, Joseph W. (Ranked Number 1)

Dermody, Kelly M.

Keker, John W. (Ranked Number 2)

Minami, Dale

Pitre, Frank M.

Sonsini, Lawrence W.

Van Nest, Robert A.

Watters, Richard C.

Top 10: 2014 Northern California Super Lawyers Top List

Dan Dell’Osso, who was Best Lawyers Trial Lawyer of the year in 2012, was once again named to the Super Lawyers list. In addition, Brian J. Malloy and Casey Kaufman were again named to the Rising Stars, which recognizes up and coming attorneys under 40.

From left to right, Daniel Dell’Osso, Casey Kaufman, Brian Malloy

For more information about our firm, visit our website.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Chrysler Recalls 525,206 Vehicles due to Ignition Switch Defect

2010 Chrysler Town and Country

2010 Chrysler Town and Country

Stemming from a safety recall in June 2011, Chrysler has expanded recall 11V-139 to include an additional 525,205 minivans due to an ignition switch defect.  Similar to the GM ignition switch recall, this defect can affect the safe operation of the airbag system if inadvertent ignition key displacement occurs.  Road conditions or some other jarring event may cause the ignition switch to move out of the run position, turning off the engine.  If the ignition key inadvertently moves into the off or accessory position while in operation, the engine will turn off.  This will depower various key safety systems including but not limited to air bags, power steering, and power braking.

Click here to read the defect notice: Chrysler Ignition Switch Defect

The decision to now recall these vehicles is from a recent discussion with NHTSA.  On June 17, 2014, Chrysler and NHTSA participated in a conference call regarding the scope of the previous recall.  NHTSA requested that Chrysler include the recall to include certain model year 2009-2010 Dodge Journey vehicles manufactured June 29, 2007, to June 17, 2010, and 2008-2010 Dodge Grand Caravan and Chrysler Town and Country vehicles manufactured January 26, 2007, to June 17, 2010.

Customers have been advised to remove all items from their key rings, leaving only the ignition key until the defect is fixed. The key fob (if applicable), should also be removed from the key ring.  Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will modify the ignition switch, free of charge.  The manufacturer has not yet provided a notification schedule. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403.  Chrysler’s number for this recall is L25.

Americans rely on their car manufacturers to provide a safe well-designed vehicle.  Sadly, that is not often the case.  The Auto Defect Attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm has successfully represented many people injured from defective Toyotas, Fords, Chryslers, Hondas, GM products and numerous other manufacturers and suppliers.  Often times, people involved in accidents do not examine the issues of defective vehicle design nor whether the car was truly crashworthy – does it contain the appropriate crash protection.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto crash, our attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm are available to consult with you.  Please contact our office at 800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

Chrysler is a registered trademark of Chrysler Group LLC.  The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes.  Chrysler Group LLC is not affiliated with this website, and Chrysler Group LLC has no affiliation with The Brandi Law Firm.  Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by Chrysler Group LLC.

, , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Graco Finally Recalls 1,910,102 Infant Car Seats due to Buckle Defect

Graco New and Improved

Current, new Graco buckles

Graco Children’s Products previously recalled 4,176,601 toddler and booster child seats due to a buckle defect earlier this year, but did not recall the infant child seats.  Now, Graco has now recalled 1,910,102 infant car seats because of a defect in unlatching the harness bucklethe same issue that plagued the earlier car seats recalled.  The buckle becomes stuck in a latched condition so that it cannot be opened by depressing the buckle’s release button.

Graco Children’s Products (Graco) is recalling certain rear-facing child restraints manufactured between July 2010 and May 2013, models SnugRide, SnugRide Classic Connect (including Classic Connect 30 and 35), SnugRide 30, SnugRide 35, SnugRide Click Connect 40, and Aprica A30.

car seat graco recall

Graco will replace the buckle with a new design, free of charge.  The manufacturer has not yet provided a notification schedule. Owners may contact Graco at 1-877-766-7470 or online at gracobucklerecall@gracobaby.com, or at consumerservices@gracobaby.com.  Note: In addition, Graco will conduct a consumer satisfaction campaign to cover infant child restraints manufactured with AmSafe QT3 and Signature buckles.  Under this consumer satisfaction campaign, the company will provide a replacement buckle at no cost to any consumer upon their request for the useful life of the child restraint.  To see if your model may be covered, or for additional information, call Graco at 1-877-766-7470, visit www.gracobucklerecall.com, or email consumerservices@gracobaby.com.

The lawyers at The Brandi Law Firm have represented a number of people involving defective consumer products and people injured due to design defects in automobiles and consumer products.  The Auto Defect Attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm has successfully represented many people injured from defective Toyotas, Fords, Chryslers, Volkswagens, GM products and numerous other manufacturers and suppliers.  Often times, people involved in accidents do not examine the issues of defective vehicle design or child restraint to determine whether the car was truly crashworthy – does it contain the appropriate crash protection.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto crash, our attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm are available to consult with you.  Please contact our office at 800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

Graco is a registered trademark of Graco Children’s Products Inc.  The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes.  Graco Children’s Products Inc.is not affiliated with this website, and Graco Children’s Products Inc.has no affiliation with The Brandi Law Firm.  Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by Graco Children’s Products Inc.

, , , , ,

Leave a comment

GM Recalls Another 8.2 Million Vehicles; GM up to 29 Million Vehicles Recalled This Year

2014 Cadillac CTS

2014 Cadillac CTS

The epidemic continues.

Today is July 1, 2014.  GM has recalled 29 million vehicles in a period of six months in 2014.  Last year alone, all car manufacturers recalled approximately 22 million vehicles total.  GM has surpassed that number in just half a year.

On Monday, June 30, GM recalled another 8.2 million vehicles stemming from the catalyst of GM’s safety crisis, the faulty ignition switch.  The latest recalls are for “unintended ignition key rotation” and cover seven vehicles.  These vehicles include the Chevrolet Malibu from 1997 to 2005, the Pontiac Grand Prix from 2004 to 2008, and the 2003-2014 Cadillac CTS.

The saga of the GM ignition switch began in February when GM reported; at first that at least six people died because of accidents involving faulty ignition switches that involved run off the road accidents.  A few weeks later, the total number of deaths linked to this recall doubled, which brought multiple investigations from federal agencies and congressional hearings.

GM recalled vehicles stands at 29 million with half the year to go.

Where will GM end when the dust settles?

Click here to read the full article: General Motors Recalls 8.2 Million More Cars

Americans rely on their car manufacturers to provide a safe well-designed vehicle.  Sadly, that is not often the case.  The Auto Defect Attorneys at the Brandi Law Firm has successfully represented many people injured from defective Toyotas, Fords, Chryslers, Volkswagens, GM products and numerous other manufacturers and suppliers.  Often times, people involved in accidents do not examine the issues of defective vehicle design nor whether the car was truly crashworthy – does it contain the appropriate crash protection.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto crash, our attorneys at the Brandi Law Firm are available to consult with you.  Please contact our office at 800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

GM is a registered trademark of General Motors Company.  The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes.  General Motors Company is not affiliated with this website, and General Motors Company has no affiliation with the Brandi Law Firm.  Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by General Motors Company.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

GM Tells Dealerships to Stop Selling 2013 and 2014 Chevrolet Cruzes Due to Air Bag Issue

2014 Chevy Cruze

2014 Chevy Cruze

For the second time this year, GM has ordered car dealerships to stop the sale of 2013 and 2014 Chevrolet Cruzes due to defective air bags.  GM has identified 33,000 vehicles in the US and Canada that may have been built with parts from the bad batch from their air bag supplier, Takata.  The issue stems from that the driver’s air bag inflator module was installed with the wrong part.  According to USA Today “A major factor in the size and expansion of the propellant recalls has been admitted bad record keeping by Takata, which has made it difficult to identify the vehicles that might have the suspect inflators.”

Click here to read the full USA Today article: GM Tells Dealers to Stop Cruze Sales for Air Bag Issue

This is the second stop-sale order on the Cruze this year.  The first was in March.  First GM ordered a stop of 2013 and 2014 models with the 1.4-liter engine.  It was followed a few days later with a recall of nearly 175,000 of the cars for a potentially defective right front axle shaft.

This is just the latest black mark in a record year for GM recalls.  GM has been involved in multiple investigations, recalls and hearings since February starting with defective ignition switches in older model vehicles.

Americans rely on their car manufacturers to provide a safe well-designed vehicle.  Sadly, that is not often the case.  The Auto Defect Attorneys at the Brandi Law Firm has successfully represented many people injured from defective Toyotas, Fords, Chryslers, Volkswagens, GM products and numerous other manufacturers and suppliers.  Often times, people involved in accidents do not examine the issues of defective vehicle design nor whether the car was truly crashworthy – does it contain the appropriate crash protection.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto crash, our attorneys at the Brandi Law Firm are available to consult with you.  Please contact our office at 800-481-1615 or email us.

Trademark Notice

GM is a registered trademark of General Motors Company. The use of this trademark is solely for product identification and informational purposes. General Motors Company is not affiliated with this website, and General Motors Company has no affiliation with the Brandi Law Firm. Nothing on this site has been authorized or approved by General Motors Company.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 166 other followers