Archive for December, 2011
Is that Ruby Real?
Posted by The Brandi Law Firm Blog in Macy's Fake Gem Lawsuit on December 22, 2011
The controversy over selling as real rubies glass filled and treated gem stones is the recent subject not only of recent lawsuits against MACY’S, (SF Superior Court Nos. CGC-09-495171 and CGC-10-495868) but a topic of great concern amongst professionals who strongly resent the practice of falsely portraying rubies as real when they are not. The Roskin Gem News report, a professional trade journal has weighed in on the practice with guidelines and information for professionals to avoid being duped:
Glass Filled Rubies – the Inside Details
Also see articles from the Accredited Gemologist Association:
Put Lipstick on a Rock and Call it a Ruby
Composite “Rubies” Pose Serious Problem for Consumers
Unfortunately consumers generally do not possess the knowledge or the expertise to know when they are buying a “ruby” that is not a real ruby. Real rubies are from the mineral corundum and are magnificent in color, hard, durable, brilliant in color, and command high prices.
How do fake rubies become real? You take a stone that is of poor quality and you add lead glass or treat it with heat to enhance its color and presentation. When pressed some will concede it is not real but insist on calling them rubies. Others will say when pressed the stone is a “treated ruby”, “enhanced ruby”, “composite ruby” or even “hybrid gemstone”. In a “composite ruby” much of the surface is fractured and the fractures are filled with glass.
The Roskin Gem News report quotes Chris Smith, President and CEO of American gemological Laboratories in New York: “After this ruby goes through the process of being cleaned, in an acid bath to clean out foreign material, what’s left is very brittle. You can literally crush it between your thumb and index finger. In the strict sense, it may still be a single piece, but you cannot polish it. So the lead glass is infused into the ruby, stabilizing it in order to be polished. Sometimes there’s more ruby than glass, but sometimes there’s more glass than ruby.”
Few will tell you the truth that what you see is not what you think you see. But isn’t that the essence of a fraud, namely, combining something fake (e.g. treatments or additives) with lies and presenting to the consumer as high value fact something that is a near worthless fiction.
What do glass filed rubies look like?
To the naked eye there is no difference to the ordinary consumer.
But under magnification, the difference is significant.
What are some of the problems with glass filled rubies?
Obviously there is the stability issues referred to by Mr. Smith. The glass filler also cannot stand household acids found in cleaning supplies containing bleach or foods such as lemons, limes, vinegar, etc. The stone below was exposed to fresh lemon juice for 48 hours and then lightly heated with torch.
So keep that ruby ring away from the kitchen or laundry
What about the price differential between glass filled and real rubies? Dramatic.
On this subject, Suzan Flamm, Assistant General Counsel of the Jeweler’s Vigilance Committee, which describes itself as “The Industry’s Guardian of Ethics and Integrity” wrote:
“The Federal Trade Commission regulates the use of many of the words associated with jewelry products, including “ruby,” “gem” and “natural.” Understanding the proper use of these words, as defined in the FTC’s Jewelry Guides, is the first step in determining the exact nature of the disclosure required.
As a starting point, the Guides state that “it is unfair or deceptive to use the unqualified [word] ‘ruby’…to describe any product that is not in fact a natural stone of the type described.” As to the use of the word “natural,” the FTC also provides boundaries, stating: “It is unfair or deceptive to use the word … ‘natural’ … to describe any industry product that is manufactured or produced artificially.”
The word “gem” is also subject to restrictions, as follows: “It is unfair or deceptive to use the word ‘gem’ to describe, identify, or refer to a ruby … product that does not possess the beauty, symmetry, rarity, and value necessary for qualification as a gem.”
Applying these rules, a seller must determine whether or not the stone sold is properly described as either “natural”, a “ruby” or a “gem.” For composite ruby, the words “natural“ or “gem” are probably inappropriate descriptors. Further, the unqualified word “ruby” is not appropriate – it should always be described.”
Sadly, sellers are ignoring the requirements of the law and simply presenting as real that which his fake.
If you purchased fine jewelry, rubies, diamonds, sapphires or other gemstones from Macy’s anywhere in the US since 2006, you may have a claim. To find out more about these issues, whether you are in New York, Los Angeles, Honolulu, Seattle, Miami, or parts between, please visit the Brandi Law Firm Macy’s Lawsuit website or contact the Brandi Law Firm Consumer Fraud Attorneys.
Watch Your Head! Post-Concussive Syndrome and You
Posted by The Brandi Law Firm Blog in General Interest on December 21, 2011
By Mylene Reuvekamp
With the recent injury to quarterback Colt McCoy, there has been a lot of discussion about concussions. Most people assume that a concussion or post-concussive syndrome can’t occur unless there has been a loss of consciousness. In fact, this is not the case and generally no physical swelling or bleeding are seen on scans. A concussion occurs when the head either accelerates rapidly and then is stopped or spun rapidly. Both of these mechanisms can be seen even in seemingly minor automobile accidents.
The severity of the injury has been scientifically shown to have no association with the risk of post-concussion injury. Symptoms usually occur within 7-10 days of the accident and include such things as headache, fatigue, dizziness, emotional changes such as irritability or anxiety, insomnia, loss of concentration and memory, or noise and light sensitivity. Many people ignore these symptoms thinking that they are related to whiplash or a neck injury and not to a concussion. There is no single way to diagnose a post-concussion injury. Your doctor may order a CT scan to determine that there is no visual change in the brain.
If the symptoms persist, neuropsychological testing may be performed to determine the deficits present. In most cases, post-concussion syndrome resolves within a matter of months. It can continue, however, indefinitely in which case cognitive therapy to focus on memory deficits and attention skills may be helpful.
If you are in a car accident and have these symptoms after a few days, seek medical attention immediately for evaluation of post-concussion syndrome. Our attorneys at the Brandi Law Firm have extensive experience handling injury cases involving concussions and post-concussive syndrome. Contact us for a free consultation if you believe you have been injured and suffered a concussion or post-concussive syndrome.
Are the Kids’ Pajamas Safe?
Posted by The Brandi Law Firm Blog in General Interest on December 16, 2011
By Thomas J. Brandi
For a number of years, we have often read of children being badly burned in house fires where their pajamas actually made the fire’s effects worse due to issues of flammability. As a result, consumer advocates fought very hard to toughened standards and remove the market unsafe pajamas, greatly reducing the serious injuries from flammable material in children’s pajamas. (See 16 CFR PARTS 1615 and 1616 of the Flammable Fabrics Act; Children’s Sleepwear)
The standards require that children’s sleep wear must be flame resistant and self extinguish if flame from a candle, match, lighter, or similar item causes them to catch fire and covers children sizes from 9 months to Size 14.
However, this fight continues and vigilance is necessary. Thanks to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) another unsafe product placing children at risk has been was recalled (http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml12/12053.html)
On December 8, 2011 The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission in cooperation with Bliss Collection LLC dba Bella Bliss of Lexington, Ky. recalled children’s pajamas because “The pajamas fail to meet the federal flammability standards for children’s sleepwear posing a risk of burn injury to children.” The pajamas were sold on line and at specialty retailers from January 2008 through June 2011 and were made in Peru.
Look in the drawer in the kid’s room to see if they have Children’s Henley Pima Cotton Pajamas. The pajamas are a two-piece, cotton sleepwear set sold in sizes 2 to 12 and come in white, blue, pink or red. “Bella Bliss” is written on the neck tag. If you find them in the drawer, in the wash, or under the bed, you should return them to the retailer for a refund, exchange, or store credit.
Earlier this year, Fashionviews recalled 4000 pairs of P.Jamas sleepwear made in Peru and Bolivia. The CPSC cited evidence that they failed to meet standards for flammability, which could be a hazard to children wearing the clothing. The sleepwear included in the recall are nightgowns, as well as two-piece shirts/pant sets in sizes XS-XL. A label on the sleepwear prints the brand-name “P.Jamas” in blue lettering, which is sewn into the back of the garments. The sleepwear is made of 100% cotton and comes in pastel colors in stripes and other patterns. They were distributed to boutique shops we well as on the company’s website between 2006 and 2010.
The Brandi Law Firm has represented numerous families suffering burn injuries and unsafe products. For more information, contact Thomas J. Brandi at www.brandilaw.com.
Fake Rubies, Fake Diamonds, Macy’s and You
Posted by The Brandi Law Firm Blog in Macy's Fake Gem Lawsuit on December 8, 2011
As we approach Christmas, many people will stroll though Macy’s stores and pass by the beautifully displayed gemstones. Sitting under glass with lots of reflecting light you will find rubies, diamonds, sapphires and other prized stones. Stuck way out of the way in some stores is a little card that tells you that what you see is not really the real thing.
In some stores you may see a card that tells you the “diamonds may be…treated.”, or that “this ruby has been heavily treated using a high refractive index lead glass to fill fractures and cavities…”
What does this mean?
That you are not buying a natural product but likely paying for the real thing.
Stated another way, what you may be buying is not a natural ruby but a composite filled with lead glass or a diamond that has been treated. Be careful, ask if it is the real thing and make sure you don’t pay a price based on the item being the real thing — no matter how steep the discount or “how good the deal”.
This year in San Francisco Superior Court there were two cases against Macy’s dealing with this issue (SF Superior Court Nos CGC-09-495171 and CGC-10-495868). At their heart the cases dealt with allegations that Macy’s knowingly sold:
- Rubies that were composites or filled with glass or lead filled glass;
- Stones were being passed as untreated “green amethyst” when in fact this stone is in reality Praseolite (a heated form of quartz) while only purple amethyst is in fact real amethyst, natural and therefore of a much higher value;
- Sapphires were fracture filled with glass;
- Black sapphires were being passed off as “black diamonds”;
- Many diamonds were enhanced by laser drilling or filling of surface cavities and fractures with a hardened substance;
- Diamonds were irradiated or heated to induce color and then represented to be natural black diamonds.
On two separate occasions on each coast of our country television crews have gone into Macy’s and found significant instances where Macy’s was not quite telling the whole truth about their jewelry. The first was Good Morning America. (http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/ConsumerNews/rubies-real-deal/story?id=8988951).
As the Good Moring America piece points out “to the naked eye, there’s no difference, but examined under a microscope, gas bubbles that form as the glass cools can be seen in the composite rubies. Experts say composite rubies are fragile, and that they’re only worth a fraction of the value of natural rubies.” The crew from Good Morning America bought four ruby rings and brought them to a gemologist Christopher Smith for testing. All were supposed to be real rubies. The result;
“We identified the presence of lead within the glass, which is conclusive proof of this material,” Smith said. The three rings in question were from three different Macy’s stores in the New York area.
The second neutral inspection was from Channel 5 KPIX in San Francisco who aired a program showing the same thing in Macy’s Stores in the Bay Area on Super Bowl Sunday 2011.
If you purchased fine jewelry, rubies, diamonds, sapphires or other gemstones from Macy’s anywhere in the US since 2006, you may have a claim. To find out more about these issues, whether you are in New York, Los Angeles, Honolulu, Seattle, Miami, or parts between, please visit the Brandi Law Firm Macy’s Lawsuit website or contact the Brandi Law Firm Consumer Fraud Attorneys.
We are representing a group of people who bought what they were told were the real things, natural rubies, diamonds, etc., paid real prices, only to later learn their jewelry was not real and worth only a fraction of their purchase price.
Yaz, Bayer, and the Whole Truth
Posted by The Brandi Law Firm Blog in Drug and Medical Device Litigation, Yaz Birth Control on December 6, 2011
According to documents unsealed in litigation involving the YAZ birth control product made by Bayer, former FDA head David Kessler stated Bayer didn’t include an analysis “that demonstrated an increase in the U.S. reporting rate” for venous thromboembolism, or clots, in a 2004 review of Yasmin’s safety provided to the agency.
According to Kessler “Bayer presented a selective view of the data, and that presentation obscured the potential risks associated with Yasmin.” Kessler also indicated that the company also promoted the oral contraceptive for unapproved uses, particularly for treatment of premenstrual syndrome. Kessler’s 196-page report was one of several such expert opinions that were released by a federal court in Illinois, where some thousands of lawsuits are pending over alleged injuries and deaths relating to Yaz and Yasmin, as well as generics. Kessler’s report was submitted on behalf of women suing the manufacturer, and he was compensated for his time.
Read the entire article here: Former FDA Commish: Bayer Hid Yasmin Data
Dr. Kessler wrote: “In my opinion, had I, or a medical review officer, known these facts prior to approval, further investigation would be warranted before a decision on Yasmin’s NDA could be made. These facts would impact the Agency’s risk-benefit equation about the drug and whether it could be approved”.
Women who used YAZ for birth control and who later suffered clots from YAZ obviously were not advised of the increased risk thereby enabling the company to maintain its competitive edge in the market. If the truth were told, sales would have decreased, doctors would have made fewer recommendations for YAZ, and more and more women would not have been exposed to costly life changing risks.
But the whole truth was not told and women and their families suffered needlessly while profits continued to roll in.
Attorneys at The Brandi Law Firm have long been involved in drug and device litigation, from the Dalkon Shield, Fen-Phen, Vioxx, Avandia, YAZ, to POP (pelvic organ prolapse) surgeries from Transvaginal mesh, bladder cancer from Actos, femur fractures from Fosamax, to toxic poisoning and revisions from De Puy ASR metal on metal hip implants. For more information contact Thomas Brandi or the Brandi Law Firm Pharmaceutical Attorneys.




